2

The god got the people_nation language confused at Babel. A god does everything logically, because of this logos.

The aim of this journal that he should lead back the folk living in the lingual sharing to each other.

WHAT MAY THE EXISTENCE BE LIKE?

1.1 ABSTRACT

The existence is absolute. Principium. This not material reports something, but beginning, origin, initiumut. But the principium word the start source which can be used in the sense of the law and a basic principle and elements in a sense. Essential, that these a meaning remained in the Latin language contents let us take it into consideration. The existence is a debate in Latin. This means a life. We would add to it that he had to mean an individual sense understood in a sense. The sense, the first and last station of the information. The existence - his fashion went by with our word the >létel<, not his reciprocator for the existence, but his manifestation, his effluence. The effluence process, and than so, inevitably temporal thing, you are simply; THE TIME. It is possible to imagine an any kind of process without time, creation which recalling was kept in the theology so, since six of the days of the biblical creation mask obvious time, so temporal process.

Latin FIO a word makes so much that he comes into existence. The causa is a condition of existence, a daily bread. FUNDO runs down and radiates, the publishes on the other hand FORAS. FORAS okay and your vein, but PRINCIPIUM reported a source in Latin. Why do we have to bury ourselves in the Latin dictionary? Because we have to find a witness without partiality from an ancient picture formed about existence and the existence. Themselves the was useful in the antiquity already and our witnesses will be ancient, languages with an old origin then already, and we have to add it to the thing that the Latin may not have counted as a protolangugae inevitably on the Earth, although it signals his elaborate nature in order that very much use a word, and his elaborated, mature grammar yes. Let us pay attention to what is old not meaning primitive one or one not known inevitably at the same time. We keep it so, that the Earth repeatedly resettled planet, many million of distant inhabited worlds' year knowledges may lie hidden in the protolangugaes afterwards so. The ancient myths of the Earth all talk about this origin sounding like fantastic one, and not though from evolution. This does not suit the ideas of the academic line very much, but to clash with the Christian theological doctrines shows, since there from 6-7000 year creations they are a teacher, that on the other hand with the diagnoses and was transferred on the bookburning is with written memoranda and the found anthropological diagnoses in a chronological order collision. It to put it mildly very obscure picture we may make it understandable with it, if the creation of the Earth (his settlement) we consider it as a cyclic event. It, we have to clear up fundamental things like that in order to be allowed to understand the construction of the universe essentially, without which real science may not be to imagine, and our work is needed for those things on his row the mostly to be watching, from which like that a lot were are in already, but after all foggy and unexplored. The essence will skulk here certainly on all of them.

1.2 EXISTENCE EXISTENCE

It is concerned about the question of the existence looking plain since millennia the scholarly minds and from among them mostly the philosophers, you are the researcher expressing an interest in the depths of the philosophy minds. This question taken for plain one tests us really if we reflect on it better, so much, that the latter one in a hundred years, since the vigorous spreading of the materialism onto this we found an any kind of substantive answer in the modern literature, and in the older times, when his authority was bigger for the philosophy yet, like this his depth, the supposed solutions were foggy then already. Empírikusnak got into a fashion in the truth of said doctrines so much on the century's front they were lost in the reiteration of their own dogmata, that their soil was lost lacking this philosophical-logic basis rather continually. The experiments put onto the foundation fail one after the other. We find bypasses and misleading reasonings in the publications instead of the exhausting one and logical answers and our science advertises doctrines with children at a contact with completeness with the existence. The religious public opinion also. The public opinion. The doctrines intended for the folk.

We examine it well thoroughly the question of the existence! Let our examination be honest, and we may leave any kind of utilizable knowledge out of consideration afterwards so. We may bring our conclusions then correctly only, you are if the dogmata coached for us do not limit our attention habits hammered into us. We pay strange attention to the words which can be found in the Hungarian language and expressions in the course of our examination, because we think that this may help a lot in the comforting solution of the world's secrets for us. We turn because of that to this language with predilection only already, because a protolangugae remained quite monolithically, but we extend our attention over other languages with an ancient origin and we make indicating these then. We examine the ancient religious teachings of our Earth in the same manner, respecting their traditions, since we - this book author's - investigators, but we are high priests at the same time beside this. His Universum Church high priests. To a god's teachings do not wish neither to add, neither to detract from it though. A god prohibited this, they would be studiable in original one only on the other hand so, and hereby to translate neither free these, it never prohibited it to a man on the other hand, that let him understand these the drop messages carrying ancient knowledge. We are ancient if we do not understand it.

Let us consider the question of the non-existence first.

What does not exist, non-existent, he, he, he does not have duration, a content, a metrics for it, his shape you are his greatness and his littleness, like this with completeness illogical it to presuppose, that the world the from nothing Latvian, since the real one from nothing an existing may never be divorcing something. As the ancient Roman ones said it; DE NIHILO NIHIL FIT! I mean; the nothing originates from nothing! Did they ask the question whether something was a first one in the universe in the antiquity already? There was incorrigible fussy ones, who asked it promptly, then of course; good, but what it was from then? It the first one!? Since the ancient contemplative ones did not find this out already reasonable answer, it was declared; it the something the from nothing Latvian and ready! They prevented the additional unpleasant questions with this, after nobody may have asked it already already with with a sound mind, that then the nothing what it was from...? This sure deviating reasoning just like that, than the theory of the panspermia, where the biological life arrives in a capsule arriving from some stars or on the back of a meteorite get down. This is because of that so only because, with this the >with hussartrick< it is possible to avoid that unpleasant question; how took shape where then. Who can establish it after a millions of years?... That stupid stone came, and the galaxy brought it from somewhere his depths. There was a life already there and was already on our Earth then. It was necessary to guess this legend making a good a nursery tale because of that and to popularise, dared for our biologists despite all knowledge and a persistent effort; a life never managed to be caused to spring forth yet. Any kind of life. They boast of this only, than with the cloning, in the course of which together back up splash about the already ready living matter, and they fancy themselves in it in the television, that they did this, they caused it to spring forth onto a life. It scare the public opinion that the man can be copied. If the man would consist of his body only; their chance would be good this way, since DNA - the complicated chain of the transmitting nucleon acids of the cells - in truth can be copied. With this only it the >little problem< arises, that with taller order (viviparous mammal) living beings never remains with the gene technique methods without a womb created >masterful<. The reasons of timeholographic are for this. In truth may create a hundred are similar to identical twins copy from the cell, but this means only a hundred similar bodies, and fortunately not a hundred men thinking with identical thoughts, chiefly not the full copying of the start individuals' personality. DNA only server - executive servant at who certain autonomy is. On the other hand two alike souls (master) is not the same way there are not two alike dots can be found in the whole universe. Fortunately. It may ask it dear a reader, what the question of the life has something to do with the fundamental question of the existence, since the life already struktúrált makrojelenség. Well, he has very many alleys to it!

We put the border of the life to the viruses because we found it in such a way that these are the smallest one, organisations which can be called one living yet today. They can crystallize, and millennia can come to life if they manage to get into suitable environment going by again. Our scholars drew the conclusions from this, that the viruses can be said for the smallest living persons, since they coast along so until millennia than some lifeless crystal, and they may behave so than some living thing. They survive the cold of the space and his void.

Well, we claim that thing being effective absurdly, that: IN THE UNIVERSE ON ALL OF THEM WHAT EXISTS; IT LIVES AT THE SAME TIME. (We may say it so, that he lives -there is). From the subatomic world to the metagalaxis. How not only lives, but is thinking at the same time. This is true for the light quanta likewise and the tachionokra forming them, you are it onto atoms, molecules, crystals and onto stones, than onto the viruses and everything, which we know only. This sounds unbelievably and unscientifically with completeness certainly in the today's age and a notion medium, but the conviction of ours that this is the unadorned truth. (See it for example: the operator effect!) This means it in Hungarian, that not at all it doesn't matter, who makes the experiment how. Believes in the success of the experiment, or doubts it. This thought affects the first for an absurdity, but the thing will be increasingly more credible then the way.

Well, let us return well to our start question, the non-existence. Very delicate question, because we have to lose our handhold to which used was got on all of them here, after we row onto waters like that where we may find an any kind of usual or learned thing already. This will be a big adventure!

The universe space and chiefly without time cannot be interpreted, like this meaningless the hypothesis that it is known by way of us things the in nothing they swim. Already that word meaningless, that the in nothing, since the may be for nothing beltartalma neither, he may not surround our world so after he or he does not have greatness or littleness. We get down to this question with additional data yet to serve in the chapter being about the space. A lot are missing on all of them from our logic building operations yet now it, that let us put irrefutable arguments in this direction. In the today's cosmology this one which cannot be experienced, beyond the event horizon thing it is called so, that: SOMEWHERE ELSE. But this relativity theory concept only inside the space-time in a case applicable, our universe used apart from the medium of a space-time this wrong, since the where it reports place already. There is not place there, and is not there! Yet too you are without is not! The there may be nothing in nothing, since the substance you are the energy térstruktúrált thing (as soon as it turns out then later), the above ones may not exist until one single pikoszekundum without a space-time so. Our instrument, our space capsule would work in the same manner, and sure our brave experimenter, if he would try to lose the space of the existence. Nothing may stay in the existence in the nothingness. We bring up arguments which can be accepted in later ones then in the 5. chapter in this direction. We got into a unpleasant situation because it is not possible to define the non-existence altogether immediately, at worst it, that; the NONENTITY and THE EXISTENCE full deficiency. The Hungarian onto this says it, that: We are outside with this all from waters! This does not mean it, that too we are on the problem, but we say that we are in him in the marinade with this expression.

This saying of ours does not mean some good thing, but help that is even more catastrophic into a situation brings for, spoils our situation longer yet. The saying writes about the waters written down in the Bible, and this sure not the usual seas covering saying, as Noe is our forefather on the manner ascribed to him sailed. The story is the evidence himself here. It is necessary to decode it if all is not a fiction, how may have happened how. The god divided the waters into two onto lower and upper waters. Inspired seas and clouds by way of the materialistic explanatory ones under this (earthly and celestial waters) interpret. The present is the god. (?) The present of the time. (?) We cannot experience this. (Although we are sure of him entirely). The sense of the underwear and upper waters the expressed himself the explanation of a source will elucidate it.

With EXISTENCE will not be our easy row if it holds out hopes for some opportunities already because of that, but it will not be like that it's simple. We have the trouble with the metrics since he and he will have significance and an opportunity for an any kind of size yet here here, after it is not possible to define such ones so without difficulty in this special state. This does not hide a big mistake like that yet alone of course, after we may return where we may hatch up measurements later in this direction onto the decision of the above question and entirely his accurate definition. It is our task first that we clear up the question philosophywise. What the smallest existing may be like on the world, from which you are a material particle known by us on all of them energy quantum can be built? What may he consist of altogether? His what kind of shape may he be?

The above one from three questions the first one it, that; what existence may be like?

Well, this thing may not be like that than some atom - for example the hydrogen atom - since we know much smaller existing at the atoms. The electron, the mass of which are here for example 1836 times smaller than that of the proton, that the mass represents his considerable proportion in the hydrogen atom, but according to us the Gell-Mann's the quarks of a theory mean a dead end in the course of the finding of the solution. For what we are looking it at these with many orders of magnitude smaller, i mean for the millionth of the greatness of the electron only his millionth can be compared with with them. Let us give a thought to it, that in as much to justify our theoretical consideration we know, the light quantum should consist of elements like this so, and this may help punctually, the smallest dose of the light, his element (or how we call it), because the photon we would like to avoid an expression. Entirely simply because it looks like a dead end according to us. Our scholars are unable to decide it since Hauygens what in fact the light, because of this their deductions and their inferences groundless and dressing-gowns. We dare to declare this because of that so resolutely, because the theories of light until now tried to build the measurement experiences into themselves though, but they did not answer substantive things like that, like what that way, what the light fetches with speed of light how, or what the speed of light fetches in the water two thirds. We know that the water is a much thicker medium naturally the air, but from this the above questions are not responded to reassuringly. (Even then, if the Cserenkov's light cones to justify everything so nicely already they showed... so what his smallest construction which recalling was kept and his phiz may be like? It certain, that our start there are not space, a space-time yet, but we may leave a thing out of consideration on an any kind of manner: We are not allowed to drop the time already from the universe's formation because our start existing presupposed then could not exist. We could not contemplate all this then so. I mean;

Something are the existence and the time inseparable.

Maybe, that we are in him in the marinade immediately with this? Since from the time we know about the fact that it is miserable directly already so little... what was said about this in our schools it vajmi little to the happiness. We may have learned one like this about this only there, that the sign of the time "t", that where the tempus from a Latin word, where the >time< they took from an English word, but foolish things occur to the man only quasi in connection with the time. Clocks, constructions, electronic oscillators and they onto suitable beats dealt his signs, possibly the succession of the historical processes. No and, that the time not money, on all certain. Something else is the time. It tallies with the public opinion that the time may be a some kind of dynamic thing only totally, since;

IT IS POSSIBLE TO GUESS AN ANY KIND OF THING OR A PROCESS, BUT IT DOES NOT EXIST IN TIME.

This law is true the existing for himself yet is needed could not exist already otherwise in order to be. It is not possible to interpret the light or the substance without time.

THE TIME IS THE BASIS OF ALL EXISTENCE.

So a safe dot of ours, from which we may make the world stir then possibly, appeared his axis. The next question looks before us yet whatever now:

What may this existing be like?

We may reach an agreement about it, that unthinkably minute, but how time will be from this? The today's physics tries out a thread-like time depiction in his theories. This derives from the fact that he takes up three of the four dimensions (the space) and a dimension remains behind with this, that quite negligently for thread-like one think. Though the time scalar (and NON VECTOR) quantity, it does not have a honoured trend really on the other hand. Minkowszki knew it yet... we have to mention it here Kaluza-Klein his theory, that >string< for a theory named. The string English word and reports only so much, that shoelace. Their publication with an original English language, which is a stencil yet with a typewriter, was found for a long time was written, and drawn with Maurice pictures was illustrated with a hand. No and in this that way it they managed to get onto superb recognition anyway, that the time has to carry the angular momentum already. This was important because the cosmology was able to explain it in no way, that from where on earth the angular momentum of the things was. All Lovely Reader knows that it roams all round dances until the largest ones because of universe's smallest things already. From the atoms the metagalaxisig turns on all of them and this that's right even it he is made worse, that the material particles into a direction spin (leftish spin), i mean it is not possible to say that the thing is the two-way one because of a rotation quantity in balance, in symmetry yes. The questionable problem would turn up dissolved complemented with the antimatter of course - what our scholars discovered - but nothing is left of right antimatter in our right space really. The antimatter exists, but does not remain permanently in his material existence, since the substance with the antimatter anihilál, crushes it, and then the angular momentum of the space the reciprocator is against it for the persistence of particles. Million it is given up after a second of existence. (Unfortunately even vacuumban... Anihilálnak, what means that they go up in smoke. The explanation of the process given universally concerns the fact that the substance becomes energy at this time on the other hand. But NON WILL THAT. The substance and the antimatter vanish equally. The light being freed in the course of the reaction no from a substance the consequence of turning into light. Antimatter omitted gallantly in the Big Bang theories beside this the supposed Big Bang may have been together with the substance in that start universe, it in the "primalenergymatterdumpling", A Steven Weinberg's 25 billion spontoon in "primalblackhole", since they should have become energy immediately. (Since all of the full universe's mass weighed down on the waking material particles onto him, yet it the +95% too, that they agree nowhere altogether!). Then from where the substance was? From the energy? Into each other they shape up than in the old fantastic films the faeces-like from flob gushing out >power<? He does not look too logical! There are two unpleasant ones in the strength: Transcendent and vectorial simultaneously. Annoying fact.

So the forming of a dynamic space-time would be good before we would deal with the thought of the energy or the substance, since a borrowed space depiction is apparent from the geometry for an inappropriate thing to the honest work. The three dimension co-ordinate system ascribed to Descartes come on older, after already Lonardo da Vinci used it, but not too that's the point! All of it some as he is inappropriate our train of thought, since he does not have dynamics, he does not have temporal existence, which we set for a prerequisite, afterwards so. A claim was born to the space before in our physics beyond this, the time entered the thing at the description of the processes only though. There is not space without time.

That expression, that; space-time, got into a fashion after all these only though, this question started being examined on the century's front in detail chiefly. Even one, even the other one, even the third variant equally virtual (physically nonexistent, transcendent) masks a thing in our physics, i mean like that that space; there is not a so real thing in exchange of the physicists, and practically with the time the same situation. These fictitious appliances and not real phenomena. The space identified with the coordinate system in us. Distance matrix, and nothing. The time is not connected to it functionally in our notion, the fourth dared space expansion may be in no way to draw into this space system saturated with directions already, we may see that tortuous solution often after it is one so, the many times the vertical one (vertical) space direction it is replaced with a time expansion not fitting altogether there. For example Stephen Howking: The short story of the time title his work popularize cosmology. They experiment so so, even even it was not affected suddenly by our scholarly minds with the solution, somehow, that we have to set out from the primariness of the time, and since the time stands for our provision initially only, this has to be the only constructor element. The space does not exist without the time, but we should say it in such a way rather that the time may exist alone, without space. Onto this not the Hungarian had that expression yet so once, that >LÉTÉL<. There back up too gives a reasonable interpretation. This meant the existing. The god's name lives, this expression connected the god with the existence functionally so. We return in the chapter under the 1.8 dots yet in this direction. We may lay it down valiantly whatever, that; the existing may be temporal only because of the character of the process. The time is the existence himself.

1.3 TOPOGRAPHY APPROACH, POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS.

A strange one like that would be good for the first solution to find, what the existence is on his lower border yes. We will approach this in such a way that we constitute two concepts the existence existence in some. The existence not expressed itself his variant dynamically lock, while the existence is a phenomenon opened dynamically. The existence, with what nothing which cannot be being watched on a manner and can be examined, may drive into that fallacy us, that so there is not something altogether, dared to approach only on a logic road maybe, but after this is the real starting basis, we have to make an attempt at him anyway.

Let us try the formal approach of the question first.

Heavy to imagine that this would be describable with the existing some kind of complex and complicated formation. I mean it seems probable that there may not be a cube, a cylinder, you are a dodecahedron shaped. The sphere, which is describable with one single data, looks logical, since we have to know his beam only. But we had some difficulty with the sphere after it is at least a in the selfsystem for a temporal existing closed dynamism has to be at his disposal because of that, after it is time (we call it ancient times here yet) and the dynamism inseparable. The Kaluza-Klein stringmodell a formation which can be compared to the spring of a spiral-bound notebook, tried out the lengthening time construction stretching steadily on his end, in what there was dynamism already, indeed, he had even the rotation, but it was possible to begin nothing with the tubular time compared to the shoelace afterwards, even afterwards, after his elaborated version onto a junction it was made capable. This was the >superstring<. The opportunity of the interaction was missing from him. For this time pipe nothing we did not buy his profit. On this time macaroni thirty years worried.

1.41 IT IS AN ONE-SIDED SOLID OF REVOLUTION!

The 1.4 subsections showed it logically, that in the origin suddenly 180 spontoon a reversal ensues, that truth yields full phase change in a passage dot in the origin. If it is a lemniszkata like this y-axle circle turn round, some an to the former toroid we secure a very like toroid-like formation, but in the origin of this formation, the smallest stricture gives a dot making one single intersecting half-turn, which it is, to effect kept recalling a phase turning before. The imagined small hole is not practically here, after all >flow through to the other side< the surface! From the exterior surface here inside, from the inside exterior, from the right left, the left becomes right? We'll see! One to the Möebius band with a very similar characteristic (but lock!!) we gain a topography surface, and like this a toroid with a unusual surface character, but many things with a character differing in everything come onto existence because of that from it, that the 5,6,7 on figures from more views to demonstrate tried.

This one-sided surface his centre evolving turns into one-sided one, which means it, because of turning out, that we have to walk two times crossing his centre in order for us to end up in the surface dot into the same one. This surface the atomic physics according to the definitions of a spin like this halfspin, but half of this half spín takes shape on a very strange manner. Not reflecting, that all of the lasting one particles some people halfspins? The proton, the electron and the neutron have a characteristic like this, but the neutrinos. The descriptions set this up based on the calculations and measurements at least. This may be true if the particles do not make axial rotation so directly only. But our annoyance a proton spins round exceeding swiftly around his axis really. The speed of light 1.41 times. The surface presented before this a friction one (twisting) may do the endless road driving into his centre from his centre with streaming, since we may place a dot with an endless cardinality on this surface because of the metrics and the full deficiency of the space, as we learned it already sometime in the school the contour, you are the sphere in his case. The piquancy of the question is hidden in the fact that we distinguished the topography of the existence from the abstracted geometry dot of the geometry simplifications resolutely with this. I mean we claim it, that;

THE PHYSICAL DOT DIFFERS FROM THE CHARACTER OF THE GEOMETRY DOT ESSENTIALLY! HE HAS TWO STATES. EXISTENCE AND EXISTENCE. Appear (omnipotent) and non appear (potent). THE FIRST MODE OF EXISTENCE IS THE POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY OF THE SECOND STATE.

The geometry singularity not identical the dot spread with his macro level in a public opinion, since the dot that we draw in a paper even then with a complex structure for example endures, if we fix only one single carbon atom on the paper with our pencil. This the one which cannot be seen for our eye, already with completeness little dot, in the reality but from 6 neutrons, 6 protons And 6 consist of an electron. you would eat a smaller graphite granule may not be already to make, but everybody may recognise it, that his expansion is very big for this dot, and differs from the theoretical dot, for which he may have any kind of expansion really. I mean the dot put down by us on paper not dot, his symbol which can be interpreted as it for us only. THE GEOMETRY DOT IS ZERO DIMENSIONAL ONE. In all senses it, since it does not exist in time! This is in the same manner with all formations which can be found in the geometry of course. So the dot, the line, the skis and it from these some constituted spatial forms. Ideal, theoretical, after the totally from the series of dots without a diameter evolving line one without a diameter, but from the line pulled onto a side in the next dimension evolving skis only yeah. An ideal one without thickness is a surface. The bodies bordered with the surfaces like this do not have one single real expansion, even if we feel this so, because onto this we were accustomed to him so with the concept of the cubic capacity somehow. The geometric bodies themselves do not have one single expansion, since it they creator and limiter surfaces do not manage one like this. Moreover in the time they exist, since they do not expand. Ideas considered as real. The thing works well entirely until the skis if we are thinking in the notion taught today, but there is some trouble with the third dimension already somehow. For the filled, cube-like notion of the space faithful they think that the things win a content by the introduction of the third expansion, after it is the thickness already entirely with a hand makes them receivable. This is doubtful theoretically already unfortunately, since it the space fills with tidying planes without thickness away onto each other with nothing theoretically, since we receive plane only in case of any amount of plane put onto each other like this result. Nothing nothing it nothing. The third dimension does not appear. But the dots with zero expansions could not constitute a series if we think through it better - that is line, directly - like this afterwards plane. The series of compiled straight dots is left of the dots without the expansion, which ones they do not make contact. The straight is nonsuccessive according to these. If he would be constant though; then though: HE WOULD BE A DOT. The nothing and his endless mathematical intractability was limiting in the course of our work on a large scale, we tried it in order to rise above this question so. This did not prove to be too plain, but pointed out that a lot are the mathematical one and our topography apparatus with a new thing at the same time can be added. The solution turned into possible one with complex-mathematical methods only, but in this Péter Jobbágy,  my friend succeeded after all. From this direction the event horizon you may read useful additives in an Hungarian Internet journal. http://esemenyhorizont.uw.hu/

A dimension pushed off from the habits a view may be suitable for us to develop the homogeneous world view for which we started building gradually him already in the above ones with him possibly. The criticism is true for the mathematics unfortunately, since fact like that, that number, does not exist altogether merely. His mapping which can be used well naturally for the world's substances which can be interpreted metrically, but likewise ideal (imaginary) world, than the geometry. In the same manner the number sets they manage to get onto a similar fate. We take pains over the formation of a physical dot managing an existence state in time, but we do not understand a thing with some material appearance by this. Our physical dot with completeness transcendent, since the time from himself there is a word. FROM THE TIME. This time written down in former ones is PHYSICAL PONT. The today is similar to a dot concept in use in nothing. Simultaneously endless and little, how the pontoon is from within because it may be disappearing so though because of one-sided topography, or the pontoon is without. However he or he does not have definable cubic capacity or expansion so just for this formation than for a dot, but opposite the dot this a dynamic singularity, that - if we observe it more thoroughly and we think it over - exterior and inside are not at its disposal because of bias. These are very objective concepts and handhold.

THE PHYSICAL DOT IS A DIMENSIONAL ONE. HALF SPIN IS HIS SURFACE BECAUSE OF HIS BIAS BECAUSE HE RETURNS AFTER TWO TURNS INTO THE START STATE. HIS ONE-SIDED SURFACE ADDITIONAL >WITH FRICTION PARAMETER<, THE SITUATION OF HIS BOILING POINT AND HIS SURFACE TO WHICH RISE WAS GIVEN WITH THIS WITH A SITUATION MODULATION PARAMETER CAN BE INVESTED, INFORMATION WORKS AS IRRADIANT ONE BECAUSE OF THIS, HIS EXISTENCE SENDING ON THE DISTURBANCE PARAMETERS LEAVING HIM SOMEBODY ELSE SIMILAR, IN THE SPACE-TIME AND IT TROUBLES SOURCE ELEMENTS SETTLING DOWN IN TIME SOMEWHERE ELSE WITH HIS TIME WAVES, AND REMEMBERS WITH THIS.

From the lemniscate truth emerged from a treatise it, that the variants of the formation looking perpendicularly take shape with interpreting the lemniscate on complex plane, i mean a standing number eight appears beside the lying number eight.

This a komplex space leaded to the formation of a double solid of revolution, the rotation axes of which stand for each other perpendicularly, introducing. One it x, the other one though it y-tengely circle we turned it round. We are looking for the definitive solution yet, but we will find it on the area of the quaternions expectedly. The former dynamic existing keep each other in the existence, since the immaginárius and the real surface may not exist already without each other if we reflect on it well. The formation >lowel< and >upper< his half separator (inside?) present dot the world's smallest hole, that his crossflow slot - as soon as from that direction already it előzőekben too we made a reference - a real slot is not at his disposal practically, since we may see it if we look at it carefully, that this surface being limited to one better intersects in the present dot with himself, similarly, as if a cone his peak an other one (set itself) we would make it meet the peak of a cone. The timer preserves this the shape of our hour glass? This gate of his there is not passage as the Chinese wise men called it? From this direction taught Lin Csi? This bias develops because of his strange topography absurdity so awfully in the existing.

1.5 SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS

With the introduction of the source elements diverse change induces our substance science, since it is possible to put all on totally new foundations with this. Since the one until now, a century's front patched formulae new it may be replaced, that the reality which can be measured by us which can be experienced may be expressed in much more accurate one. All this means that the real one, full one is reality from this more complex, a lot may be different in everything, since we researched the reality of the third dimension chiefly temporarily with our instruments, and on this onto the three space expansions we may obtain additional knowledge on the more full reality exceeding developed reality revealed with the help of instruments, that at least six space-times make the application of a dimension necessary inevitably. It may strengthen our this suspicion, that the claim of the 11-16 dimensional mathematical interpretations arose at the description of the particles, what is not unreal then, if under an examination with deeper philosophy we buy the real construction of the space-time. It eleddig used space-time model morbidly weak, with what his rigid, standing, approach with children for the reality, and reflects the medieval, Newtonian world view so truly at least, as soon as our physics and our chemistry taught in the notion being at a standstill under mechanistic influence until the today. This space-perception at Descartes who can be found, but already Leonardo da at Vinci, and the fatal error of his that the dimension of the time is missing from him. Geometrical notion. The time far-flung >to leave out< not exaggerated one prominent thing, if our view we are heading onto the spatial description of objects to limit, but leads to impossibilities and paradoxes promptly, in as much we wish to write the physical phenomena down faithfully, or we attempt to understand the biological processes, you are the life his essence. The formations written down in the geometrical matrices do not exist until a moment in the time. We have to introduce inevitably the time spherically his offensive structures. This change will lead to the development of view revolution like that then that he has to induce all areas of science toward a dynamic change revolutionarily quasi. The introduction of the concept of the time will extract it in the chemistry, physics, biology first his effect, but shortly new plastic and metal industry technology leads to that of appearing, since the molecular view resting on the clearer foundations appears in truth on these areas then first forcefully, where a serious substantive quality is little with an investment and in changes in price is manifested then. An industrial branch applying all molecular technology in the same manner will recognise the significance of this soon. It is the essence that we may secure right substances with the introduction of the new view. Our today's science does not use the source elements universally, so afterwards we may not ensure this comparison, bar one - the Budapest one in a book given out by technical university already can be found Maxwell the such criticism of equations, and they source (wake up) the claim of investing him with elements. We may read already here from being doubled energy. The ancient one (presumably not with an earthly origin) science unambiguously (in all big cultures) used these elements, you are different well afterwards so distortions on suffered one much ancient one and then our medieval memory, you are today's their topography depiction passed through correct or some sort of distortions which can be recognised on a building. The regular resurrection of the architectural and ornamental tendencies dubbed the neoclassic, archaising style occurring periodically strengthened this line. Onto this all of the next subsections will show baggier illustrations and evidences.

1.6 ARCHITECTURE & PREMISES

Since the ancient times can be found those architectural memories, that it by way of us it previous outlined topography memory it is carried. It was declared elements decorating these simply nowadays, that according to the spread doctrines as a result of some kind of architectural evolution, the triumph of the sense, you are only so blindly they took shape. In the interpretation of the materialistic discredit these his basis some kind of obskurus a world was hiedelemi. The flaw of this approach it, that these architectural ornaments and architectural proportions pervade the whole ancient architecture, and equally can be found on a continent inhabited on all of them. Our opinion only the measure of the distortions an examination is needed under it to have bought, that the knowledge the final result of informational deterioration occurring as a result of millennial errodation. We have to examine the cosmic knowledge which can be found in the residues with big attention here, because of which we have to ramble often in the course of our discovery work the written one, ethnographic, legend, folk-tale and our architectural memories, Lovely Reader will face the construction until now in all chapters because of this, that all speciality memories found by us is struggling along to align. The dimension source our architectural memories chiefly the expressed himself - so the four-petalled flower - his form can be found many times, that motive surrounded with a circle most often can be found our architectural ornamental art. This - in as much wants to reflect the philosophical reality of the thing faithfully - puts on the form of a so four-petalled hole shaping a flower. This because of that so essential, because the hollow draughting expresses that this topography segment means that passage faithfully, through which the other side dimension part, the future come round onto our side, that side, that we expressed himself in a world's form experience. The future is beyond the hole. This dimension passage of course with inhuman scale, since the scale of this hole far under the atomic world can be found. His sizes somewhere the 10^-they may fall into 42 metres of order of magnitude, which means a so small thing, which is unimaginable quasi in our world. The first significant digit follows the zero and the decimal point after 41 zeros. The smallest atom, a hydrogen the diameter of atom cca.10^-around 10 metres yes. This with 32 orders of magnitude (a million times a million times a million times a million times a million times a hundred) bigger, than he does not have that little gate of his passage about what we talk here. An order of magnitude until all of them tízszerest present! We did not find out the spatial topography temporarily in the course of the examination of the architectural memories unfortunately, only onto the sectional depiction. From this direction we show some examples on the undermentioned figures. We agreed on the other hand the not expressed itself little pub well indicating his surface clearly in the Budapest town park, where the dynamics unbelievably plastically, from the apple-like shaped well round all the time flowing water exemplifies it.

1.7 PHILOSOPHICAL DESCRIPTIONS

The oldest philosophical description accrued to us in a poem form, and this a crystalised interpretation bygone may be his residue, since what it was possible to put into a poem already, it anyway for final result-like one can be thought, at least in that sense, as the science of an age may have got onto the maximum. The thing that somebody reached the stage of the dimension sources in the science of the construction of the time, anyway for substantive one can be said. This is the peak of the cognition. This poem description Veda (knowledge) derives from the additional literature of his books. We may find similar ones other world view notions, or the folk-tales marvellously in the course of the examination of his accurate construction. These written memories joining saint books are unattainable ones, secret ones in most ages. Veda books secret teachings UPANISADS a title was given to it. The above one is his meaning. In these additional informations like that and interpretations can be found, that it is possible to understand Véda books with his help. This understanding of course on the conservative line of our very potential since today's science this not even a little he had his effect felt. From the literature work influencing the real thinkers' activity considerably whatever there is a word here, since blowing up the first nuclear bomb Enrico Fermi was delivered his mouth it at a thousand days more brightly - statement originating from Veda. As a matter of fact Veda already with many thousand years before unambiguously from space cities, space battles, spaceships, laser and from nuclear weapons and they write about the destructive effects induced by them. The western historians this simply listen, or degrading cheat. Much are the objective evidentiary diagnosis though.

It MAHÁ-NARAJANA UPANISAD writes about the topography of the source so:

There is nothing, which is minuter at him, and there is nothing beyond him. Bigger at the big one. One, endless, his shape invisible. Eternal and ancient. In the dimness light.

Well, this poem is about the basic principle of the space-time already, but a paradoxical statement figures in the first row. It, that this thing on the world the smallest one and after all bigger at the big one. This not somebody else, than the space-time wake up his characteristic, which is a basis characteristic, expressed itself - than transmission - figures in the space-time. The poem detail that sounds so indicates this:

He is the wheel hub in the world wheel.

He the fire, he the wind and the water,...

But; that from the reason source (too) the poem sounds, that row shows it, that:

He created the world creation. From the water created the world.

The fire, the water and the wind of course secret keyword, and practically nothing he has nothing to do with the stereotypical solutions and to the explanations of the today's philosophers with materialistic orientation. We deserve these with an explanation and evidences in the next chapters, from which our hopes - than as it is the sense of former verses - it will lighten up before readers. This chapter is about the dimension source, the successor from the water, then from the fire, and the wind comes then then (air) his interpretation. These interpretations year ten a thousand secret locked away was constituted till now. His doctrine; HERMETIKA. So, what the fact that he created the world creation means? It, that this the something (he) was before at all this. This the it may be something, that our religions creator with an attribute concern and they talk about him because of this with profound respect like that? We know about ten reason sources. This the something (somebody) creates even the creation?! Was before at all this, we may have read it because of this, that: >Ethernal and ancient<. OKAY. His name; who and us. this and yeah. Father ntabhava and Anyo nyábháva. I mean at least two reason sources were needed for the creation.

The eternal one means that something is logical and not effect. This the IS was some NOT SPRUNG, but always , this the reason of the universe's existence, indeed, the reason of all existing things. He does not have mass, not particle, not material, he does not have tangible. TIME.

With an eye which cannot be seen his shape, there is not a glance, that this far is effective. A heart, a thought, a desire can catch up with it. Who knows this gains an eternal life.

This beautiful hope for Lowely Reader!? The philosophical description of the source only it óind origin we found it in books in detail, but his topography all big civilisations can be found even our days, remained in the Christian traditions so. The source does not separate here sensibly, but the equivalent of toporafical indisputable. We found two sentences in James's book only already in the Bible from this direction:

Word is was initially. Íge first god vala. On all of them what is from Latvian word was.

This is the omnipotent one and his potent description. The not expressed itself and the a source expressed itself. This is the sentence in all translation which cannot be found already. The essence is running out always on a suspicious manner... Word figures in my Bible with a Latin variant even more hundred times word, The last one (St. Stephan) expense five times. From this only the honed quoted one with three creation senses. As if killing him would be the essence the aim. Dot it runs out of the scripture, which is the world's essence?

THE TELLTALE LITERARY MONUMENTS

Himself the fundamental idea already our chronology, so Jesus Christ (Josua) existed before his birth, since Platon and the platoni himself filled twenty years on an academy Aristoteles wrote many thoughts down already likewise fundamentally, than it the later neoplatonist thinkers made it. The existence like that everything penetrating and everything including something that you are ENS OUSA = juice was defined with a word. The existence apart from existing standing something. Two words were used than categories setting out from this, the substance and the essence. SZUB (Latin) = under something, beyond something, but -ban,-ben (since nothing remains apart from the space-time) and the substantia means one existing really. Boiling here, radiating, father. The second half of the word was not left in the Latin with an independent meaning, but STANCIA reports a station in the Slav languages, that in our case the one before the essence and it it parent, wake up station, stage may report it. The substance gives rise to it the essence. Himself the essence = substantive, the marrow of something sense, and in the Latin word with a modern origin, but the food, food in Latin ESCA, let him fall in German = to eat, but himself the food (this will be a later very understandable context), and ES = Ő(He!), but >AZ (That!)< in a sense in use, not talking about it, that it ES IST ZEIT = it's time, means that he is the time rather. In the English ESSENCE = essence, socket, ESSENTIA = in an essential, fundamental, indispensable sense in use, what gains an important sense in our fourth chapter since this will be his role punctually. This will be the world's only essence really after we shed light on the things.

In the Chinese CUO to work, but to sit and foundation sense too, C'UN = to live, to exist, to preserve in a sense in use and C'UNG = -tól, -től sense, but place + time in a sense, CSI = foundation, but with an arched intonation himself, himself, with a descending intonation to send, but to go in to remember in a sense with an intonation descending on CSI in use, to creep in, to get in, but energy, today, and how interesting apart from the present time the gold like this enter sporting event and the word tightly, to restrict his sense shows an agreement which cannot be believed really already with the present dot narrowing until the infinity; the picture of flowing through time forms into enough purely on the golden father. CS'I period, and >THIS!< but with a descending emphasis air and CS'I-CSI the miracle. C'E in case of an arched emphasis >THIS< and with an incline word. CS'U the get out, but with an arched emphasis clear, with slant though place. Yin = okay and female principium, female, and the name of the moon, but how thought-provoking, that >SOUND< it is used in a sense! Good reports it, that okay, but the uranium, the centipede or the post are called so, or that the oil may be interesting for us yet good. said arched to possess, friend, but better, right. LÍ to recede away with a rising emphasis, with an arched emphasis within, from within, -ban, -ben, but sense and gift, to do with a descending emphasis you are strength, Ling with a rising emphasis bell, but the zero, the nothing, and his punctuation mark a circle! The dot is written with a little circle!! LJU the sense of a word then the fourth chapter turns into exciting one, since slant means six with an emphasis, but to be left with an incline, to preserve, to keep and can leak with a sense. This is all necessary to the function of the space-time. The Chinese (Japanese) with two descending emphases ÖR, but the same one means it with an incline, that his son for somebody! I mean after the father the second the boy, in which he expresses himself,. What is interesting yet; landscape = (with slant) form, but very much, he has a Mr. sense, and the Sun some enter sporting event, that T'ÁJ JÁNG, what the man in the Sun is apparently type onto a space source, indicates the sun-god, who is a man always in the ancient notion. The Hungarians according to the ethnographic knowledge Ursa Major (his UM) his folk.

RELIGIOUS MEMORIES

The picture of the source blurred mostly already in the written memories, but the religious ornamental elements offer a richer repository at it. The simple-mindedness made a confession here the mostly failure. After the Bible and the Koran prohibit from the god's depiction onto sky, onto land, onto water or into air, this was depicted only everywhere afterwards because of this where he may have been only. (Just! Than the children...). Lowely Reader would think that the popes took this biblical prohibition seriously at least, but that's right the sixtusi the fresco of a chapel, on which Adam is the father, towards it it is flexing his finger, Ádám though towards the father, exactly the Roman pope the god ordered the depiction of humanoid. We could think that the father's such idea stands near to the reality, and the single god gained a depiction here only. But is not so. Very frequent his incidence on the front of the mass tables, you. not the kind that we believe at the first try, but he that four-petalled flower, (the potent one) that a lot-decorates many churches in all world religions. We may see one like this behind the father's altar in the Szeged cathedral. (Votive church). The cathedral was made ready on the past century's end, and then we will refer to him many times, since the quite accurate repository of the symbol systems. The potent depiction behind the altar is unambiguous. He is the world's venerable creator. The man of course in the god to himself wants to depict similar one (the Bible prohibited from the depiction because of this) and is not satisfied with it, that in him sources just like this a thousand and billion they are at work. Onto the god's picture and his resemblance. Fraktal Nome-somebody else. The believers of the Islam advertise it in such a way that they took the prohibition seriously really and the god invested with the manlike shape was not drawn, some than Michelangelo, but the ornaments of the architecturas, or their carpet samples depict this only quasi. Many times entirely exactly. It is known well: the sample saint. This is good because some crumbs of our forefathers' knowledge fell on us at least so. The god trigger, but not malicious - Einstein said it. He was his truth. We find the creator's depiction likewise in the eastern churches, and not only in the east, but you are the precolumbian at Maya already to tolteks, olmeks can be found the creation was the depiction of all of his topography elements. Let an architectural stand for an example here element from the church of the time. The source onto a Mayan manner. Of course likewise his navel, than on the upper picture of our crown. Because he is the navel of the universe. It is that little four-petalled flower. The Maya say it today, that Ataiszról they took shelter in their today's homeland, and they actually the Huns progeny.

All folk and an ethnic group regarded the creator as a saint, lived anywhere on the Earth. Indeed we may risk the statement that he came from anywhere possibly from the galaxy. Since the legends of all ancient people_nation indicate this quasi. The Hungarians Ursa Major folk. Ursa = bear. And that, everything Hungarian knows a certain constellation. Our grandmothers all knew it. We call it Big Dipper. This may appear incredible, but let us look for it only! The Chineses the Hungarians SJUNG JA LI it is called on a name. SJUNG reports a more aged brother with emphasis slant just like that , but SJUNG-NU reports Asian Hun, what shows our folk's origin, and sheds light on that impossible lie, that the Huns or the Scythian ones became extinct once already from the Earth. We are Hun. Now. Many Hun tribes bought a refuge in today's Hunnia. The Chinese capital state-forming family the han; our folk relative. Our blood relations live between them. But what we did not come from China after all. They say that they learned the science of the writing from us so. SJUNG reports a bear though with a rising emphasis (JÁ = tusk, LI = profit). The bear the Hun folk saint (protected?) it was respected as an animal. The heavy one is later in times as a sacrificial animal. (Maybe because of that, drawn distant one their home, the stars távolából originated? Maybe.)

On this old Chinese coin two source signs can be found. This the k'ó. A little square marks it. Reports it, that mouth, slot. We we say it so, that orifice. Reports it if we write a bigger square round the smaller square, that to turn back. Jo is better in Hungarian. On the right of the money a gate sign meaning an ancient one in a sign yes.

CONTINUATION