33. Wordtime           

THE WORD IN NATURE

In the previous pages, and in many other pages we have already discussed the question of life. We don?t want to refer back to our great ancestors because they started off on entirely different paths in seeking an answer to the origin of life. Our dear readers should have probably seen already (whoever got this far in reading) that each time we examine a phenomenon a whole different path is taken. Do not take me wrong, this is not a revolt, we just start from tradition. We also said that we are pro-creationists but not in a conventional clerical rigidity but by logically interpreting our ancient traditions. There is some kind of stuff all throughout the whole of the Universe which is constantly changing, replicating, self-spawning and surprisingly sentient. The Word (Ige). Thus, with a long ˇ. As I was writing this, I looked at the serial number. 33. 33 is the number of God. :-)
The world religions all say something similar of creation, and indeed, the logic does not change much, even if that is done in different languages. Life and matter cannot be created from a static thing, because such a thing has never even existed. Neither then, nor today. (Only in the minds). The emanation of the Word as well as the primordial Being was written down by all ancient religions but only the narrow-minded people turned them into anthropomorphic gods. They created for themselves a pantheonful of gods in their own likeness and image. The Greek's doing this already made us smile three thousand years back. The question - coming across as paradoxical - is, therefore, can God be antropomorphic? (Similar to humans) Yes, God can be anthropomorphic. Can such an anthropomorphic god create anything? Yes, he can. Even man can create, let alone God. So what is God, then? Creature. As man. All we see is part of creation. All. It is often preached that Jesus is the Word Incarnate. No such a thing was said of man or cacti, though that would be pristine truth too. For fullness sake, I shall cite the "original" texts here.

The Bible

Had I got all of my other Bible editions handy too, then all the other texts would have gone differently. In English, the primary meaning of Word is literal and the meaning "scripture" is just a connotation. In the German text it is Wort. Word is closer to the original, because it's almost like World. Word and the world are related and if we consider that the world means also light in our language... (Gyújtsatok világot = ignite the flame) and this can be found in the upper right (yellowish) section. The holy book clearly states that God is the Word. This is similar in each translation. But what does life was in him, and the life was the light of men. Mean?

If life is in him then God is not a being similar to man but something incomprehensibly great. Even if there is life only on Earth. Does it mean then, that all of that is within him?

 Of course we do! You are silly or you are not paying attention!! If all was created from the Word then where is God? Well, everywhere. All what you see; the Word. Or otherwise, SZ?, Wort, ?ge. The Incarnate Word is nothing other than mater. It was very rightly identified with Jesus (Isa) since in him, in the soul, there resided a special space source. A divine space source. There is light and space source in everyone, but there is a whole different one in him. I said ?there is? because he is with us even at this very moment. In body. He is the system-superior who is above everyone and all things but not in a human sense but because he is God. This is what gives his power over things not sword or atomic bombs. Even that was created out of him. All. Not some kind of molded blood and bones meat mush, but out of the Word. He is the first one of the Word. He was before that and so the lord of the time systems was created out of him.

  Yes, of course! You represent it. That weird statue at the top of the page does too. You can see that on the Szeged dome. There is a dual polarity in the world. There is antimatter, antilight, and ant existence. It is not that their bad, their only mirrored. Antimatter and mater annihilate each other. They are destructive for each other. Like Lady Wind in the Arvisura of the Huns, which is nothing more than the anti space. If someone winds up there somehow all of their material gets annihilated. For good. That is another creation.
 

Well, this is how an aromatic hydrocarbon looks like in our tunnel microscope and just a little bit of needle represents the "optics" in this. It makes very close sweeps just above the examined material all the while there is only a few volts of voltage applied in the needle. A sensitive piece of electronics amplifies the tiny current changes, which, like a corona discharge, is headed towards the material. The atoms slightly protrude from the theoretical "plane" like some kind of protruding bumps. We can convert these tiny current changes into images which really show the atoms. They are seen here, of course, organized into ring chains and it is also shown here that the carbon atoms are not on one plain in the molecule. That is, there are really atoms in mater indeed; they just came up too hastily with the indivisibility concept. An atom is not indivisible. They are made up of additional components and even those are divisible.
 

Here, only the outermost atomic "surfaces" are visible in these pseudo-color images which not so long ago we called electron shells. It is also shown that they have fairly marked surfaces that are and they have a fairly discernable edge. This is a liquid substance, and the molecules seem to be organized nicely in a regular, crystal like line. Our genetic material is much more complicated since they are made up of hundreds of thousands and millions of atoms.
 

The only problem with this image is that it is right handed. 99, 9 percent of genetic materials are left handed, likewise our material particles, of which they are composed. In the microscopic image above the atoms are even a little bit larger like in this DNS illustration figure. That is, the dream to see the atoms has long been realized. I have contrapted such experiments even ten years ago. Although I did not have 25 000 usds for this gadget, but I have taken a good look at it in KFKI and I made a much better one, only much simply built. Just with $25. :-)
Use your head not your back. We started off with discarded Suprafon piezo record player?s pick-up. It became the scanner. We just used it the other way around. We connected the deflection signals to it. The two crystals were still too fast for our computers at the time. And it was a Commodore 64. It did the deflection and the AD as well. I would not want to sing odes to the resolution. 200x200 points. In two colors. This is looked down on today, the TEM image shown above is 210x200 pixels.
This does, however, make it quite informative still.
 

These are the older DNA figures, but they?re good though, because they are left handed. This is only a very small portion of our genetic material. In the left figure you can take a look at the plan view of this molecule and you can see that the tenfold symmetry is striking. What is thought-provoking is why don't the creatures look like a spring?
This morphology could even be used as proof to back up some kind of nonsense like this. If you could unravel this it would look like an incredibly long ladder. How on earth will such a spring-like piece of junk become people, a kangaroo, or a geranium? What determines and what keeps life in a formal system?
 

I put the right picture onto a head for the mood of the joke. The leftish procession leftish procession is left over then. Only in the examination of the processions with completeness inexperienced it is believed, that the other one saw a pole afar with a left-hand thread his end the right nut can be screwed onto it then. This sure impossible A above DNA exists, only in the opposite world. The substance is right there. The kirality not reversible and commutative the substances of the life. Very interesting, that the image molecule of the smell substance of the garlic was synthetize, but it was totally odourless. Our nose being smelling cells it is not noticed. They may not have met one like this in the nature. The molecule was image only of course, and no his atoms. There is a so important curiosity even in the world of the atoms because there are living and lifeless atoms. More punctually they living persons, onto only an other to life fractal rank. Four staffs are from these.

This is what our figure of ancient origin speaks of, which found refuge in our folk art from the machinations of powers which are out to slowly do away with everything. This signal has a much more universal meaning than we might think. This does not only signify this creation where we live but the other three ones as well. This fourfold division is embodied in the form of the four arch cherubs in Christian thought. G bri-El, Mikha-El, Uri-El, Rafa-El. The four cherubs of the Holy Crown, two of whom have been taken off.

The four main branches of creation in our ethnography.

Man does not resemble the DNA and RNA molecules? morphological appearance believed to be the basic life carriers, but then, how do the "organic" materials contained in them define the form? Amino acids are the same in plants, animals and humans, yet they are very different from cabbage or a rose bush. They managed to juggle a sequence out from the genetic material of an insect which determines the eyes. With this, its offspring ended up without eyes whatsoever. Victory. The pulled the same with a mouse. So we had blind mice. Victory! They then spliced the insect eye sequence into the genes of the mouse. It wound up with normal eyes and not such complex eyes which the insect sequences should have meant. Sic transit gloria mundi.

Not to mention the African gender changers where sexually mature young girls transformed at once within the span of one year into full manhood. Just like that. Several people in a village. This was not an idiot psycho's gender change operation but a continuous transformation. There are many documented cases, and it blew people's minds. BUT what about the X and Y chromosomes, which determine gender characters. But where did their male chromosomes come from? They were not hermaphrodites, but entirely characteristic ladies. Now, does God want to warn feminists or the geneticists? The atoms themselves do not usually come together into living beings. Rocks do not calve lions, or even mice. And in them, according to a former statement of mine, there lies intelligence too. Our science has never had the chance to observe the emergence of living beings out of lifeless mater. That is: There is not one single palpable piece of evidence to back up the evolutionary theory about the origin of life. So far this has only been a theory, so for now it is not even scientific.

We are looking for a more logical and empirical way.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2007 UNIVERSUM UNIVERSITAS. This publication was prepared for personal use only.
Absolutely no part of this publication may be reproduced or published without the express permission of the author.

Translation © Varga Péter (email: vargatranslation@gmail.com)