WORDTIMES 36.       

WHERE DOES THE WAVE NATURE OF LIGHT COME FROM AND
WHAT COUSES IT TO HAVE COLOR.

We have already talked about light many times, but I have recieved so many questions about it that I will try to give a logical and understandable answer for our Rearers to these questions in this page. There will be even more pages about life too, but light, energy, is also a very important element of life, and so many questions need to be clarified about light.A lot of books have been written on light. But I did not find answers to these questions at all. They were only beating around the bush.

The texts just deal with experiential facts, and theoretical questions rarely give a meaningful answer. Light itself is something spatial, and that is a very tricky thing. As I have already described, energy is nothing more than a self-entangled time loop (which is quite a wild thing) but it is itself the cause of itself. It feeds on tis own past. This is true for all time loops, that is why physicists and mathematicians working with relativity theory toss them. They think it's a bad result. However, this is the key to a good and real (and effective) solution. So the kid is thrown out of the window with the bath water. Their prejudice is stronger than their adventuresomeness.

Let's see what nature is suggesting! The transparency of materials do not depend on their hardness and not even on their state because there are transparent gases, liquids and solids. They may be whitish or colorful. But there is something that gives us an interesting clue. Materislas with a density greater than five (specific weight) (5 g / cm3) are always metallic in look and are not transparent in visible light. Of course, it is possible to create a thin layer of these so as to transmit the visible light, and this light is generally bluish-tinted (also thickness-dependent). But if it is transparent, it is mostly bluish. It has a similar color when I put two polar filters on each other and I turn their polar planes apart. It does not turn blackbut it gets really dark. Everyone can get it from a dead calculator, or a digital watch that does not work anymore. This is a small film strip, a little film sheet. If you've taken it out, put it on another LCD-d calculator or LCD clock. You can see very interesting things. If you cut it in half and put the pieces on top of each other, you can see the blue color I have mentioned by rotating the pieces of the film on each other. I've been looking for one that would give a different color, but unfortunately I did not find it, although I have several types of films. Looks as though they use a cookie cutter method, just one type of technique to make this polarizator. Here, the short wavelength of the blue color may be significant.

If no other kind of polarizer is available, I will just make one that will prove all this, and this is not a problem at all, since we get a different kind of suggestion from nature since the color and density of chrystals show a correlation which, as we know, depends on the atomic mass of atoms in them. It is interesting how they pull in "closer and closer" their electron shells as the number of nucleons increase. As a reminder, I will recall this from the previous page, because that is a very important thing. it gives clues about atoms.

Light with very short wavelengths typically travels through low specific weight materials. Yet milk is white and it hardly lets light pass trough. Red flowers are red because they absorb the other colors while red cellophane is red because it only allows the red color to pass. Gamma radiation is only absorbed well by lead or uranium. Others do as well but usually that is dangerous in itself. Therefore, lead is used. This is cheaper and is not easily decomposed because it is the end point of almost every atomic decomposition process. It will no longer decompose. It is a soft metal which can be cut or carved with a knife. This amorphous softness also contributes to its absorbing properties because its atomic disorder makes it difficult for light to penetrate the tangled crystal lattice. Incredible as it may be, but water absorbs a lot of the dangerous radiation, though it's a good light transmitter in visible light. The window glass is also quite amorphous, yet transparent. Annoying. So what makes any mater pass the light trough or why does it absorb it? Some of the questions may seem completely amateurish, since the scholars of light science have been able to answer these questions for a hundred years. Really?

Well, let's take it one by one. It is said that gamma radiation is high energy in comparison to visible light, and infrared represents still less energy. I have doubts about this. I have the feeling that penetrating power is confused for the energy carried. Let's just quote this contradiction from the 40-year-old function table! How are things connected? The speed of light I hope has not changed since then.

These data by themselves can point to many interesting things. Red light moves in the air at 299705,500 km/s and blue at 299703,500 km/s. Their speed difference is 2 km per second. Its refractive index is 1,0002906 and 1,0002970. Given that we see only a very small spectrum portion, this difference is also remarkable when we think of how wide the band of color spectrum invisible for us is. They claim that the velocity of different light quanta does not differ in vacuum. According to the table, their wavelength differs somewhat, which later on could turn out to be very important.

It can be seen very well in the textbook diagram that red (v) light from the white light which has been broken by the prism - which is faster even in air according to the table - is bent les by the prism than violet which is supposed to have higher energy (i). Well, my question is, which bullet is a bullet bullet with a bigger energy; the one that just drops in front of my feet or the one that reaches the target. Everyone will vote for the one that hits the mark, right? And how so with light? The faster and less bending one, or the light quantum which is more sluggis? If, however, the red one has more energy then why does the blue one penetrate deeper into the mater? Is it because the blue lightquantum is smaller than the red one, and therefore it can penetrate more effectively between the atoms and into the nucleons themselves? This seems more likely.
 

The smaller light quantum more easiely penetrates under the scaly surface of the nucleons, but it is easier for it to leave it. After Chernobyl, an Ukrainian research director visited me (Dr. Gulyas). He asked me for advice as to how quickly could the soils be freed from radiation. I advised him to do a lot of (per week), sprinkling with dilute boric acid solution and pray for a lot of sunshine. At that time, radiation will first intensify, then to decrease rapidly.

He phoned me later that it worked. This was a double treatment. Sunlight fills up the isotope atoms with light at all wavelengths yet opens up their scales so that
earth having come to the surface in a more excited state can better release the much smaller gamma quanta. Because where warm (high light) is, there is faster half-
life. Therefore, the process of isotope C14 dating is also photosensitive. The sample exposed to strong light will first radiate up to 100 times faster and will then begin to relax.

Returning to our original questions, light and material fluctuate due to time feedback.

Lasting long l but not infinitely. It's not an electromagnetic wave. The color and wavelength of the light result from the mechanical diameter of the time loop. I do not know yet whether there are light quanta created in a separate plane and ones created in a separate space, or whether the one and the same kind oscillates between the plane and the spatial vibration states. The latter seems more likely. We are now preparing to take a series of measurements to determine this. We've got some raheel, down-to earth tips. "Color" polarizers are expected to (partially) give an answer to this question.

There are many things that will follow from this. Vacuum is not perfect in space, so we are essentially orbiting in the stratosphere of the Sun, our central star. What it means is that it is a medium radiated by the dust material and stars of the whole of the galaxy which is very dilute yet of considerable amount so the light quanta, as they travel their course, pass by very many atoms. Near and far. Atoms are not compacted in the same way as light quanta. Their propagating spherical longitudinal wave-spaces interact with each other at great distances, causing deviations in their path. If there is such a high light dispersion in our atmosphere, this phenomenon must exist in space as well.

I have only done one experiment on this so far. I looked at the sky with an ultraviolet and infrared-sensitive image intensifier, and the result was thoughtful. I saw in infrared a hundred times as many stars as in the visible range, and thruogh the ultraviolet amplifier much less stars were visible.
 

If we look at the stars through the gas-medium of the universe (and we cannot do otherwise), the red light is most likely to come to our eyes from a star because the blue light quanta are scattered throughout their journey. The fact that we see them whitish is just because there is too little light four our light-seeing eyes (our light cones) and we only see "black and white". Photographs with long exposures will reveal a wonderful and colorful universe. That is, the stars scintellate in all colors. Yeah, that does not change that blue light is dispersed the most and red the least. I would like these astronomical colleagues and our cosmologists to think about it. This undeniable medium dispersion basically changes our image and perception of the universe around us. The M 20-21 dust galaxy, due to the large mass of illuminated material, dazzles in the sky with spectacular colors.

If we look at the stars through the gas-medium of the universe (and we cannot do otherwise), the red light is most likely to come to our eyes from a star because the blue light quanta are scattered throughout their journey. The fact that we see them whitish is just because there is too little light four our light-seeing eyes (our light cones) and we only see "black and white". Photographs with long exposures will reveal a wonderful and colorful universe. That is, the stars scintellate in all colors. Yeah, that does not change that blue light is dispersed the most and red the least. I would like these astronomical colleagues and our cosmologists to think about it. This undeniable medium dispersion basically changes our image and perception of the universe around us. The M 20-21 dust galaxy, due to the large mass of illuminated material, dazzles in the sky with spectacular colors. If you like astronomy, check out our start page or go to Anita's astronomical websites

Light is energy itself. It is not only informative through its color. Each light quanta brings us the message of its starry world, its planetary system, the living creatures there, and all their thoughts. We can not understand this with our instruments yet, but there is a mysterious something in our soul that may even interpret the beauty of the universe to its infinity and the thoughts of the created creatures in it.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2007 UNIVERSUM UNIVERSITAS. This publication was prepared for personal use only.
Absolutely no part of this publication may be reproduced or published without the express permission of the author.

Translation © Varga Péter (email: vargatranslation@gmail.com)