* * GRAVITY OPTICS * * |
|
You may believe that I am going to write about something entirely new but I won't. I will guide our dear readers through a series of typically bad conclusions. And I have got my bludgeon ready too. If we tear off all feet of a spider and if we tell it to jump, it won't but that's not because it's gone deaf. Our entire light quantum issue is a comedy of errors. Scientific. |
|
We've already pointed out some errors, but interestingly, they did not seem to have any opponents or supporters. Let's look at the question of why certain photometric phenomena - which so far have not been given much attention - come about! |
|
Let's look at the optical image of a half plane. Here, on the left side of the picture, the contiguous black part is a plate. It does not matter what it is made of. One iron sheet will suffice, but the most telling picture for me was the one of a tungsten plate. The phenomenon - contrary to rumor - depends on density (specific weight). Light passing by the plate makes such a strange image on the screen placed behind it. Its distribution function also varies according to specific weight. It will be either more thinly or more densely striped. |
DIFFRACTION AND BENDING OF LIGHT BY A HALF-PLANE * |
When light passes through a narrow aperture on a razor blade, a symmetric figure is obtained. It is immediately apparent that the bright bands have become much wider. This is not only because the diffraction interference picture appears more contrasting on the two covered sides. The screen is not shaded from light which ruins the contrast on the right side of the half-plane. It also gives the spectrum of the material; we just need to look a bit closer to notice it. It can also be used for non-invasive material analysis is based on the wave spaces emanated by the material. |
GAP DIFFRACTION |
The image here shows the diffraction image of a strain of hair. Originally it was symmetrical, but I deliberately cut it so that it was comparable to the half-plane diffraction. The screen here is also badly shaded from light, so the contrast is similar to the indicated image. The analogy is unquestionable because light passing by any material behaves in this way. I recommend the protocols of the related measurements. <http://hunok.hu/vegyes/tireslab-english/index10.html> |
DIFFRACTION ON A
|
We are circling a very important issue, which is more important than some optical oddities. Light is energy itself, and has been blatantly trying to point people's attention to one of the quintessences of the universe for centuries. Having bypassed the material, its path is bent so much that it can even turn in behind the half-plane. An explanation for this has long been offered through the wave-dynamics of water, although that is mostly a phenomenon of a flat-plain, whereas light always propagates in spherical wave spaces. This is not to say that its light-seeds cannot be situated along one single plane. It's like sound propagation. Let's look at what's in the official literature. It's been repeated for circa one hundred years like the infallible truth.The authors are uncritically copying each other. * Dr. Kálmán Bernolák; The Light MK 1981 (Hungarian book) |
|
This is what you get when
it comes to trying to think spatially by a brain which cannot see beyond
the blackboard and the sheet
of paper. The top figure shows the polarized light. The sinusoidal wave is
planar, so it naturally lends
itself to demonstrating the undulation of waves. Well, but what's waving
this time and how does
such a flat wave spread? I say: no how at all. Such a wave of light has
never been. No such
animal exists as a linear plane, either. That is planar. The bigger
error is shown in the lower
picture. This "circularly polar" light has forgotten vibrating, it just
rotates with the same amplitude
around axis x. If the author had wrapped sinoid around axis x, the author
would be a bit better off,
even if it would still be an error. There is no such spiral light. Such a
wave-world does not describe
and cannot even describe a very four-dimensional world in all of its
elements. Yes, but the spherical
and dynamic, spreading wave-world cannot be sketched with such Max and
Moritz comic strip
drawings. Light is not like that at all. It is a wave and quantum all at
the same time. Simultaneously. It |
|
This idea only has one problem i.e. this sinusoidal summary cannot be used as an explanation for a fully monochromatic laser, even though the grid image is very distinctively presented. Just one single type (monochromatic) vibration is unsuitable for this purpose. We surely can come up with solutions which are more sophisticated and which are also applicable to dynamic spaces and which do not try to explain one of the cardinal issues of the universe in such a simplistic way. This is scandalous neglect. There are hundreds of such jokes in our university textbooks too. Let's tidy up!! You cannot tell anyone so I'll tell everybody. We want such insights from you. We'll draw 10 books among the submitters. Mail address below. Click on the envelope and write it out of yourself. You want to grow up from the flat-brainedness, don't you? |
|
|
|
* UNIVERSUM UNIVERSITAS 2003 September 4 *ALL RIGHTS RESERVED *
This publication was prepared for personal use only.
Absolutely no part of this publication may be reproduced or published
without the express permission of the author. |
|
Translation © Varga Péter (email: vargatranslation@gmail.com) |