WORD TIMES 41

 If it is a wave, how does it wave?

On the previous page there were some strange statements thatlight is not like the best universities nowadaysteach. Then what is it like? Can the many thousands of measurements that the bestexperts conducted be all just mistakes? No. The professionals mostlymeasured accurately and well. The instruments worked well too. Then howdo we dare to question their knowledge?!

We were sure we would hit serious opposition as we would no longer be discussing the structure of time - which, by the way, no one on the entire planet has the slightest clue about today -since by so doing we are reaching into such a beehive which is protected by its little bees with the kind of ambition which is almost fit for a religious fanatic. This is a natural human reaction.

We are not of any other opinion; we have our own opinion

 Light is not an electromagnetic wave, because there is nothing in it which would justify that. It does not exist in flat wave form, even though this is what the polarization phenomenon suggests. In doing so, light shows an interesting phenomenon, it looks as if it was flattened, as if it was as flat as a plane sine wave. Since the sine wave image of the transverse wave fits with the thing well and that's why the best minds accepted it without any criticism. It was a huge mumble. I already saw the same figure of the light in an astronomical book published in 1916 and they keep making drawings of it to this day. I have seen it but I cannot seem to find the figure, so I drew it myself.

Two waves go right at right angles and are shifted in phase also by 90^o, so this is a crosswise sine and cosine. So when the electrical property is at its maximum the magnetic is at the very minimum. This figure is true and untrue at the same time. The misleading part in it is depending on where we look from it could be either way. This figure really shows the growth and decrease of the magnetic field and the electric field but it has nothing to do with light unfortunately. There are no such waves in light.

Well, let's see what kind of electrons make such waves! Since a wave is like this in every decent person's mind, well these electrons have were explained with the same dumb Moritz cartoons such as light. This comes from the misconception that if we suppose that the electron is a particle (because it leaves a fairly small fog trail behind in the fog room, i.e. it has a clearly visible path, that is it is some kind of a little berry, which in other experiments perplexingly seems to be completely characteristically wave-like. Such a representation experiment is shown in this figure. This electron has a wavelength, amplitude and even moves in a normal circular orbit. There are also scientific formulas decorating the figure making it come across as much more scientific.

 The fly in the ointment is that there is no such electron or electron-wave either in the real world. Because the electron is spherical-like.

In this figure, it is already a berry, and as a kind of decent berry it goes along its course like a little ball bearing. This berry is also included in the figure above, just to help visual understanding. Because it is both berry and wave at the same time. The thing is both true and false. The electron is a corpuscle. But what does ?corpuscle? mean? You find it in the Latin dictionary at letter C and corpuscle is corpus's diminutive form. That is, a small body. But it also means lifeless body or something like shadow, the soul of the dead. These are all very, very meaningful meanings and the connotation of the soul indicates the "dual nature" of ancient interpretation. It is also a corpse but also a spirit.

 To have no doubts about the perception, the book from which the illustrations were borrowed, shows how a circular rotation will become a sine. Yes, this is how I learned the sine function back in the day also. But It has nothing to do with the real electron.

The fulfillment of Bohr's quantum condition was seen in that if there is an integer number whole wave around the nucleus. I have seen such figures and also ones which  were perpendicular to this, but of course both can be  laced into the compartment of "/science historical foolishness/". It is a plane-brained idea. Electrons do not circle around such orbits, either. Likewise, there is no "probabilistic cloud" in that sense, either as it is believed. This is because the subatomic concept of "place" and "movement" has never been determined.
We have defined this before. The electron actually exists in "n" places, more precisely it is located at as many places at the same time as the number of spaces of space generating sources it exists in.

All such sources generate a space-time system emanating spherically at light velocity and they move in so many directions, and they make the unlucky electron exist in so many places in their own-time as many directions they arrive from. This wave world has radial and tangential components as well.
Our question: Then how do line spectra come about?

 This is a continuous spectrum. It?s just an ideal light in which there are all the colors from red to violet. If a substance is at high temperature it gives off a lot of light because it wants to get rid of unnecessary excitation. This is the emanation of an absolute black body, or should I have said an absolute white body now? Only because white is only distinguished from black by the brightness signal. In electronics, anyway. You could even say that black is the darkest white.

 When you observe the light of a street (distant) incandescent lamp through a glass prism you will see such a rainbow strip (dot). Almost with a flawlessly continuous color gradient. If you look for a mercury or a sodium vapor lamp, you'll be in for a funny surprise because you will see the lamps as separate color dots and you will
you even can easily tell what light powders are in it mixed. With the sodium vapor lamp, you can observe two very bright amber dots, which is none other than the D1, D2 lines in the Na spectral image. In essence, you'll see the dominant lines of Na. If you do not have a prism, then get a 6 to 7 centimeter glass strip off of a glazier and have it cut all to the same length and then glue them together with FBS glue into a prism.
You should also glue a bottom to it. After an hour you can fill it with water and you will have a nice
little prism to play with. (Almost for free)

 Let's go back to the second figure now! There are colored stripes on it on black background. You can see below it is the reverse of the same, but there the colors are missing exactly here. Why, though, is this really so?

This is the scientific explanation for this. As a result of external energy transmission, the electrons jump to more exterior shells, and then in ca. 10^-8 sec go back to their original location and release the unnecessary energy. Well, yes, but how many turns do they do in the meantime? A few billion certainly. Questions: Why and how and mainly where do they store "in the meantime" the "energy?? How can a wave-pack do this? If they just jump out and in, then why do they generate a spectrum. That will probably fit well with the hop function. Why are these linear spectra - very characteristic of atomic structures ? born? A glowing substance will emit certain colors when a higher frequency light passes through them, then they essentially exactly absorb what otherwise they would normally emanate. Waves do not really swallow anything. Should it follow, however, that they are particles after all? It?s an ambivalent thing.

Now that we have criticized the explanation, we should come up with a better one. Everyone can be wrong, but that's not chique. Let's make a new "mistake?. It may not turn out to be a real "scientific mistake", but it will still do for us.

 If an electron jumps back, it will not do so in a step function-like way but gradually along the decrease of the energy of the atom. Should it follow, however, that it will generate a spectrum? This light stretches form one color to the other. This is somehow displayed in the spectrum as well because of the lines' having different widths. We think of these lines as solid colors, or as monochromatic, but they're not quite so. But why do these lines appear in the continuous spectral image, anyways? Because the atom rotates its electrons brokenly, unsteadily.

The electron is a special expression of the atomic nucleus. It is not an independent particle, but its ever-organic part of it. Today they believe that it is independent, but it is not. The electron generates the proton and the proton generates the electron. Essentially we can only talk about neutrons always, only it's either the excited
or unexcited kind. It will become hydrogen when excited. It's suspicious that the issue is even more complicated, but it should be our working hypothesis for now. The electron and the proton generate each other, even when they get far away from each other. Through the one-dimensional universe. This is made up of indefinitely thin, threadlike elements. It can be said to be timeless. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen phenomenon refers to it. It's timelessly fast. It does not violate causality, because it is only timeless, not earlier.(http://www.google.co.hu>
search engine: EPR)

This is a strange branching system, billions of points start from each point, and then they branch  again and again. Through this, all things in the whole universe are connected all the way down to the subatomic ones. Because there are even smaller atoms beyond our well-known atoms. These can also be arranged into a "submengeleyev" table. We may think the tau, muon, and electronutrinos to have already been discovered here. Many of these are present in the immediate vicinity of humans and animals. Amongst others, these are what our aura is made of.

Everything - absolutely all that we know - are imagined by time sources. Whether it comes to light quanta, whether material particles, their structure is created by these. Their emanations and effects are known by our conventional science of the day only it misinterprets it. Let's look at this for an example!

DIFFRACTION

These two figures are from the same optics book as the sine wave one, and illustrates the problem quite well. If light passes near a material obstacle it does not do the logical thing as shown by the upper graph, but the bottom illogical ones. Its waves bend toward the object through the object's effect and they do not behave in a manner that is normal for a decent light. Surface roughness was given to me as an explanation. I think light is the one who is better at physics.

Bending is a fact. Well, and this figure comes the closest to light's real nature. Because it has already been berry, a sinusoidal wave a notebook spring-like wave, and now it has become a wave emanating in layers. No doubt, the author even put the lambda into it. But I have even read about needle-like light ray. It is time we decided what we have on our hands here. We have already successful shown that the deflection is material-dependent. If I make that little black lens from a different material each time the phenomenon becomes very different. The skeptics should put their rodlets of different materials into the same measuring tube. This is so that the surface roughness will not change. The  phenomenon, however, will remain. This proves that light diffraction follows the more bent space-time's optical effects in the environment of the material. Materials having bigger specific weight will cause more deflection.Just as in the astronomy, when masses end up behind each other, "gravity lenses" are observed.

This is a good thing because this takes us much closer to things being of double nature and while respecting our honorable predecessors' blatant mistakes, we want to make it clear that we have not made many new discoveries we only interpreted differently those great discoveries which helped us understand how the world works. The same thing must be in light or particles because they interact.
 

The excited hydrogen atom can take such shapes. Of these, in the minds of men, the left upper concept is most prevalent. In reality, the electrons pass through the crowded atomic nucleus with a loose swish. To this I could not find any explanation. These figures are terribly far from the theoretical Moritz cartoon drawings. If we listen, we can deduct some of consequences from it.

 All this is produced by a single electron. The electron is generated by approximately 512 time sources. It is a branch tree, fractal, of three time sources, which multipliesin the end into 512. There is not just reproduction in the process but there is also a continuous expiration that stems from the fact that many of the phenomenon  producing tachyons run beyond the maintainer's past-space because only it is its own past which holds it in the virtual branching and re-creation process. Essentially, we can think of the thing like our mirror image seen in several mirrors, which move with a little time lag along with us, and although they all seem real, there is just one real thing in it all. Which is exactly ourselves. So it is this with the electron as well. The starting sources see themselves in more and more places because every branch seems real. And as it is with the trees, the smallest branch or rootlet is also the tree itself. One cell gives rise to the other and they maintain together the whole system. The electron is such a formation. The three central sources probably branch out on a single major branch and an ever-increasing time difference (time contradiction) generates mirrors, which coalesces into a coherent layer in the end. There are three such dominant layers out of which the inside one is smooth and the the outside one has a fuzzier surface.

There are two such centers in the neutrons, a Sun and a Moon Center. They are essentially symmetrically located. Probably both of them generates electrons, just different ones. From this generation evolves further the proton around the electrons, and this development generates much bigger "tachionbushes". 740000 (about 2 x 320000) could be the number of the surface fractal's all source elements. The central system here has already such a rotating effect that the source elements do not reach by even turning back their own-past, so they simply disappear. There are five mirror layers here emanating outwardly, the topmost looks like galvanized wool.
(Golden fleece) This is to be obtained by the prince in the fairy tale, the youngest one even, which also indicates that it is a fractal element which has gotten all the way up to the surface. When this has been done, he takes this home with a female-type source (rescued princess) who had been locked up in the castle of the seven-headed all the while, and his transporting space makes it possible for this hugely bloated symmetry blast to start its creation fertility-dance all over again. Until the end of time. But no longer. This is how an electron becomes a proton and a proton becomes an electron... This is mater. There is nothing in it, yet it is palpable. It is not a material surface, yet it either locks within itself or reflects the light quanta which smashes into it.

If a lot of light is accumulated in the neutron's belly, then it will end up like Roly-Poly in the end. This is the fourth state, the plasma state. In this state mater is already on the verge of completely perishing. This is what also cavitation creates. That?s why lightnings make such a big crack. Essentially it is the same as annihilation. Well, and this is why it generates electromagnetic signals of such a wide spectrum. X-ray and gamma radiation as well. Such is also created during arc welding, only no one gave a flying hoot about it. Just go ahead and measure it.

The simplest particle is also surrounded by wave spaces emanating at the speed of light. They typically change when another particle comes nearby. They now jointly represent a common wave space. In this space such potential-holes are created which orbit around the nucleus with very rapid emanation but the kind are also formed which essentially are stationary. They organize the solid material.
 

LETTER TO US - E-MAILFOLLOWNEXT

UNIVERSUM UNIVERSITAS  14 September 2003  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

This publication was prepared for personal use only.
Absolutely no part of this publication may be reproduced or published without the express permission of the author.

Translation © Varga Péter 11 January 2018 (email: vargatranslation@gmail.com)